Showing posts with label Scandal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Scandal. Show all posts
Wednesday, August 14, 2013
West Jersey Tea Party joins lawsuit against IRS
The Medford-based West Jersey Tea Party has joined a class action lawsuit filed by a host of tea parties and other conservative groups from across the country against the Internal Revenue Service for allegedly targeting them for extra scrutiny, harassment and delays when they applied for tax-exempt status.
The West Jersey Tea Party is one of approximately 30 groups now participating as plaintiffs in the lawsuit, which was originally filed May 20 in U.S. District Court in Cincinnati by the Colfax, Calif.-based NorCal Tea Party Patriots in response to a Treasury Department inspector general’s report that revealed tax-exemption applications from tea party groups and other conservative and religious organizations across the country had been singled-out by IRS employees for extra scrutiny and delays.
Applications from some progressive or liberal groups also received extra scrutiny as well.
The complaint alleges the IRS actions violated the groups’ constitutional rights and federal privacy laws. It seeks unspecified damages for “loss of benefit of tax exempt status, cost of complying with burdensome requests, loss of donors and membership fees … punitive damages, litigation costs and reasonable attorney’s fees.”
West Jersey Tea Party joined the plaintiffs last week and was expected to be named in forthcoming legal documents, officials said.
Read More...
IRS still hasn't fixed Tea Party problems
WASHINGTON -- Front-line screeners at the Internal Revenue Service
don't have any guidance on how to handle tax-exempt applications from
political groups in the wake of the Tea Party scandal, an IRS employee
told congressional investigators this month.
Without that guidance, the IRS is giving all applications from political advocacy groups a secondary screening. And Tea Party groups are getting a second look whether there's any indication of political advocacy or not.
That's according to an unnamed IRS agent in the Cincinnati office whose desk is the first stop for non-profit groups seeking tax-exempt status. The 15-year IRS employee was interviewed by House Ways and Means Committee investigators behind closed doors August 1. USA TODAY reviewed a redacted transcript of the interview Monday.
House Republicans say the interview shows that the IRS is still targeting Tea Party groups.
"IRS screeners continue to flag certain applications for secondary scrutiny based on name alone," House Ways and Means Committee Chairman David Camp, R-Mich., said in a letter Monday to acting IRS commissioner Daniel Werfel. The interview shows that Werfel's efforts to correct the problems in the Exempt Organization Office have failed, Camp said.
Read More...
Without that guidance, the IRS is giving all applications from political advocacy groups a secondary screening. And Tea Party groups are getting a second look whether there's any indication of political advocacy or not.
That's according to an unnamed IRS agent in the Cincinnati office whose desk is the first stop for non-profit groups seeking tax-exempt status. The 15-year IRS employee was interviewed by House Ways and Means Committee investigators behind closed doors August 1. USA TODAY reviewed a redacted transcript of the interview Monday.
House Republicans say the interview shows that the IRS is still targeting Tea Party groups.
"IRS screeners continue to flag certain applications for secondary scrutiny based on name alone," House Ways and Means Committee Chairman David Camp, R-Mich., said in a letter Monday to acting IRS commissioner Daniel Werfel. The interview shows that Werfel's efforts to correct the problems in the Exempt Organization Office have failed, Camp said.
Read More...
Tuesday, August 6, 2013
The Tea Party on the comeback trail
They say no publicity is bad publicity. Is the same true for aggressive oversight by the Internal Revenue Service?
That's a question some folks in the Tea Party might be asking. Amidst the scandal of a politicized IRS putting conservative groups through the wringer prior to the 2012 elections, the Tea Party finds itself the subject of a number of recent media accounts.
It makes sense to take a more sober look at the Tea Party, about as maligned a political group as has come down the recent pike. For example, there was never a racist tack to anything the Tea Party advocated, and racists were never a welcome or prominent part of Tea Party rallies. There wasn't anything more outrageous about 99.9 percent of Tea Party gatherings than there was about 79.9 percent of anti-Bush rallies in the 1990s. After all, one man's heartfelt political beliefs are another's dangerous radicalism.
Still, none of that stopped portrayals of the Tea Party as something just short of an energized and resurgent Klan. So, too, with the slang "tea baggers" moniker which, if applied with the same ill intent to other groups, could possibly be construed as a hate crime.
Read More...
Monday, August 5, 2013
NPR Posts House Chart Laying Out IRS Harassment of Tea Party
There were only seven “progressive” groups targeted and all seven were approved for tax-exempt status. By contrast, the IRS targeted 104 anti-Obama groups, and 56 of them are still waiting for approval (or gave up). French says it makes the New York Times look silly:
At
If progressives experienced similar targeting, why didn’t they make any
notable contemporaneous complaints? After all, conservatives raised the
issue well over a year ago, members of Congress asked the IRS
commissioner about it directly, and the New York Times was even moved by
the complaints to write its now-clownish March 7, 2012, editorial claiming the IRS was merely “do[ing] its job.”
Perhaps progressives didn’t complain because their targeting experience involved seven groups that were asked an average of just five additional questions (rounded up to be generous) and were approved at a 100 percent rate.
By contrast, 104 ”phony scandal” conservative groups experienced an average of 15 additional questions (14.9 to be exact), only 46 percent were approved, and 56 groups are either waiting for a determination or have withdrawn in frustration. There is simply no comparison.
Perhaps progressives didn’t complain because their targeting experience involved seven groups that were asked an average of just five additional questions (rounded up to be generous) and were approved at a 100 percent rate.
By contrast, 104 ”phony scandal” conservative groups experienced an average of 15 additional questions (14.9 to be exact), only 46 percent were approved, and 56 groups are either waiting for a determination or have withdrawn in frustration. There is simply no comparison.
Saturday, August 3, 2013
Issa to IRS - "You are slow rolling us!"
Commentary: If there is nothing to hide, then why are IRS officials not releasing information, taking the 5th Amendment, and "resigning"?
Friday, August 2, 2013
New Congressional Subpoenas of Treasury Department for IRS Documents Regarding Tea Party
House Oversight Committee Chairman
Darrell Issa sent a subpoena for U.S. Internal Revenue Service
documents to the Treasury secretary, saying he thinks the
agency’s chief counsel’s office is “compromised.”
“You are slow-rolling us,” Issa told acting IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel.
“That’s not true,” Werfel responded.
Issa’s move escalates the confrontation between Republicans and the administration over the IRS, which apologized in May for applying tougher scrutiny to Tea Party groups applying for tax-exempt status.
As Congress leaves for a five-week recess, Issa rejects President Barack Obama’s attempt to label the matter a “phony” scandal and insists that incomplete responses make it impossible to determine what happened and who was responsible.
At least four IRS officials have lost their positions. Seven congressional committees have opened inquiries into the IRS, requesting internal documents that would help explain how and why the agency scrutinized Tea Party groups.
“I’ve asked you for information; you’re not forthcoming,” Issa told Werfel. “The office of chief counsel, a politically appointed office, has been compromised.”
Read More...
(Commentary: The Office of the Chief Counsel has Barack Obama's political appointee William Wilkens who is only 1 of 2 Obama appointees out of the 60,000 total employees. The ties to the White House appear to be materializing, but Congress cannot seem to get timely cooperation.)
IRS Chief Counsel William Wilkins a Big Donor and Loyal Democrat
As witnesses have testified
to the House Ways and Means Committee, the chief counsel for the
Internal Revenue Service may have played a role in the IRS’s practice of
reserving special scrutiny for Tea Party and other conservative
political groups. William Wilkins, chief counsel and one of two
political appointees at the IRS, was “closely involved in some of the
applications” for tax-exempt status, according to a press release from
the committee.
Read More...
This is the face of a big donor to Barack Obama, William Wilkins. He is one of only 2 political appointees by Barack Obama in the I.R.S. His office has been implicated in front of the U.S. Congress by I.R.S. employees in the targeting of TEA Party groups.
Read More...
This is the face of a big donor to Barack Obama, William Wilkins. He is one of only 2 political appointees by Barack Obama in the I.R.S. His office has been implicated in front of the U.S. Congress by I.R.S. employees in the targeting of TEA Party groups.
Congressional Testimony: IRS Chief Counsel William Wilkins Office Played Part in Scandal - Obama Appointee
Career IRS employees have testified on Capitol Hill that the federal
agency's chief counsel played a part in the scandal of targeting conservatives....
Read More...
Read More...
IRS scoreboard: 100 percent of “targeted” liberal groups were approved, conservatives languished
A House Ways and Means Committee staff analysis of the applications of
111 conservative and progressive groups applying for tax exempt status
found conservative applicants faced, “more questions, more denials, more
delays,” says committee Chairman Dave Camp, R-Mich. That is, when
the IRS sent groups letters asking for further information,
conservative groups were asked more questions — on average, three times
more. All of the groups with “progressive” in their name were ultimately
approved, while only 46 percent of conservative groups won approval. Others are still waiting for an answer or gave up.
Top I.R.S. Official Invokes the 5th Amendment in I.R.S. - TEA Party Scandal
Lois Lerner, the top I.R.S. official invokes the 5th Amendment in I.R.S. - TEA Party Scandal
She has since been placed on PAID administrative leave. Two other top officials have already "resigned".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)